
New book explores Robinson's testimony against Robeson
Clip: 1/27/2026 | 8m 10sVideo has Closed Captions
'Kings and Pawns' explores Jackie Robinson's reluctant testimony against Paul Robeson
At the beginning of the Cold War in 1949, Jackie Robinson appeared before the House Un-American Activities Committee to disavow the comments of another prominent Black American, actor, singer and activist Paul Robeson. That testimony is the subject of "Kings and Pawns" by Howard Bryant. Amna Nawaz sat down with Bryant to unpack the forces that ultimately pitted the men against each other.
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback
Major corporate funding for the PBS News Hour is provided by BDO, BNSF, Consumer Cellular, American Cruise Lines, and Raymond James. Funding for the PBS NewsHour Weekend is provided by...

New book explores Robinson's testimony against Robeson
Clip: 1/27/2026 | 8m 10sVideo has Closed Captions
At the beginning of the Cold War in 1949, Jackie Robinson appeared before the House Un-American Activities Committee to disavow the comments of another prominent Black American, actor, singer and activist Paul Robeson. That testimony is the subject of "Kings and Pawns" by Howard Bryant. Amna Nawaz sat down with Bryant to unpack the forces that ultimately pitted the men against each other.
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback
How to Watch PBS News Hour
PBS News Hour is available to stream on pbs.org and the free PBS App, available on iPhone, Apple TV, Android TV, Android smartphones, Amazon Fire TV, Amazon Fire Tablet, Roku, Samsung Smart TV, and Vizio.
Providing Support for PBS.org
Learn Moreabout PBS online sponsorshipGEOFF BENNETT: At the beginning of the Cold# War in 1949, baseball great Jackie Robinson## appeared before the House Un-American# Activities Committee to publicly disavow## the comments of another prominent Black# American actor, singer and activist Paul## Robeson.
That fateful testimony is the# subject of a new book, "Kings and Pawns:## Jackie Robinson and Paul Robeson in America,"# by journalist and author Howard Bryant.
I sat down with Bryant recently to# unpack the parallel lives of these## two trailblazing men and the forces that# ultimately pitted them against each other.
Howard Bryant, welcome back to the "News Hour."
HOWARD BRYANT, Author, "Kings and Pawns: Jackie# Robinson and Paul Robeson in America": Yes, thanks## for having me back.
GEOFF BENNETT: And let's start our conversation# with the key moment .. in front of the House un-American Activities# Committee in 1949.
Paul Robeson was this## outspoken activist with Soviet sympathies and# he had been quoted as saying -- it turned out## the quote was somewhat exaggerated, but he was# saying that Black Americans would never fight## for a country like the U.S.
against a country like# the Soviet Union that believed in their equality.
And this was Robeson's response# in front of the committee: JACKIE ROBINSON, Major League Baseball Player:# I have been asked to express my views on Paul## Robeson's statement in Paris, to the effect that# American Negroes would refuse to fight in any war## against Russia because we love Russia so much.# I haven't any comment to make, except that -- on## that statement, except that, if Mr.
Robeson# actually made it, it sounds very silly to me.
But he has a right to his personal# views.
And if he wants to sound silly## when he expresses them in public,# that's his business and not mine.
GEOFF BENNETT: So how did Jackie Robinson find# himself there pitted against Paul Robeson?
HOWARD BRYANT: Well, the biggest reason# he found himself pitted against Robeson## is from his employer, Branch Rickey,# the president of the Brooklyn Dodgers,## the man responsible for integrating# the big leagues with Robinson in 1947.
Jackie really felt a responsibility.
He felt# a loyalty to Rickey.
Rickey really implored## him to appear.
Jackie didn't want to do# it.
He felt like it was not his area.
He## was not that well-versed in the politics and# certainly not the politics of the Cold War.
But he also felt another responsibility,## which was in his memoir he would say that# he did not want the white allies who were## sympathetic to civil rights to abandon that# fight if they felt that Black citizens were## disloyal to the United States, and he felt# a sense of responsibility to ensure that.
GEOFF BENNETT: Paul Robeson,# we should remind folks,## was a giant of his time.
Is his# disappearance from popular memory,## is that a historical accident or# a deliberate act of forgetting?
HOWARD BRYANT: It's a 100 percent deliberate act.
And it shows the power of the Cold War and# the power of McCarthyism and so much of the## language that we're hearing today about# enemy of the people and the enemy within.## This is what it was back then.
And I think# there was no greater disqualifying word,## no greater weapon against an American citizen# than to call them a communist at that time.
And I think one of the things that I was really# trying to get at is the tension in the African## American community in this book, because so much# of the Black establishment felt that Robeson was## toxic, and they abandoned him as well and, in# doing that, really isolated him and set the stage## for the federal government and the rest of the# country to really turn its back on him as well.
It was certainly not an accident.# Time did some of it but really## it was deliberate because of# the tensions of that period.
GEOFF BENNETT: And how did Jackie Robinson come to## think of that testimony later in# his own life?
Did he regret it?
HOWARD BRYANT: Well, exactly, Geoff.
And I think that the -- regret is a hard# word for Jackie, because he's .. just like Robeson was an athlete.
And it's# really hard to admit that he was wrong.## However, he and Paul Robeson both ended# up at the end of their lives quite## disillusioned at the lack of progress# in the country, and Jackie especially.
That's why the title is what it is.
The questions# of whether or not I did the right thing and## whether or not I was being used or manipulated# or whether Robeson was or whether we all were,## Rachel Robinson gave a great interview# in 1976 where she said that Jackie was## a patriot.
He was a citizen.
And it was# -- he was, my country, right or wrong.
But he did receive -- she said, we# got two bad pieces of advice that## we never really lived down.
One was Jackie# Robinson's support of Richard Nixon in the## 1960 presidential election.
And the other was# this testimony and -- against Robeson in 1949.
And so he didn't exactly say I# regret doing it, but he did say,## if asked to do it again, I would say no.# So I think that's as close as we got to it.
GEOFF BENNETT: You call this story an# exposed route on the beaten path of the## story of baseball integration.
What made you# want to write about this era and these men?
HOWARD BRYANT: Really,# embarrassment was the first.
I have been such a baseball fan for so# long and I have been reading about .. Robeson and Jackie Robinson.
And how many# times if you read baseball history that## Jackie Robinson testified against Paul# Robeson?
And then I just kept reading,## and I felt like the story was so# relevant to today.
And it's so important.
These two giants, how could it# be that you had -- at one point,## Paul Robeson was the most famous Black# man in the world and Jackie Robinson,## the most important Black athlete in the second# half of the 20th century.
How did this happen?## How did they find themselves in opposition?
What# were the forces that put them in this predicament?
And, to me, it was just so representative of this# question that African Americans are constantly## having and we have to this day about belonging# and about patriotism and about that twoness,## that ability to, one, be patriotic and feel like# you are part of this country while at the same## time living in at that time a segregated society# and all of the forces that sort of came to it.
It's a really important moment that I# just felt was completely underreported.
GEOFF BENNETT: Building on your point# about the parallels between that time## and our -- this current moment, what lessons# do you think this story has for us right now?
HOWARD BRYANT: I think the biggest lesson# to me when I think about -- especially when## I think about Paul Robeson, is the# power of the times that you live in.
The complacency that we have today is very,# very similar to the complacency that people## felt back then, that the country wouldn't go as# far, that we still believed in our institutions,## and the institutions would save us# and that common sense would prevail.
And you think about that, it sounds# very similar to how we are today,## that this is just the time and we will get# through it.
But the effect of the Cold War,## the effect of McCarthyism on Paul Robeson's life,# the United States did not allow him to leave the## country.
They refused to issue him a passport,# which was unconstitutional, and yet it happened.
There were all kinds of legal and extralegal# things that took place there that really## destroyed this man.
And, on the other# hand, when it came to Jackie Robinson,## we talk about April 15, 1947 as the# transformative moment that it was,## but we also don't talk about what it# did to Jackie Robinson as a person.
And so what I wanted to do was# sort of break from a little bit## of the mythology and dig into the# effects of what these pioneering## men have -- what they went through in real time# and the -- and, really, when I think about it,## how -- what is past is prologue.
So much# of what is happening then is happening now.
GEOFF BENNETT: The book is "Kings and Pawns:## Jackie Robinson and Paul Robeson in America"# by journalist and author Howard Bryant.
Howard, always great to speak with you.
Thank you.
HOWARD BRYANT: Thank you again, Geoff.
A Brief But Spectacular take on protecting what we love
Video has Closed Captions
Clip: 1/27/2026 | 3m 35s | A Brief But Spectacular take on protecting what we love (3m 35s)
How the White House tone on Minnesota shootings has evolved
Video has Closed Captions
Clip: 1/27/2026 | 2m 53s | How the White House tone on Minnesota shootings has evolved (2m 53s)
Minn. clashes mirror civil war simulation, professor says
Video has Closed Captions
Clip: 1/27/2026 | 7m 28s | Minnesota confrontations mirror simulation of how civil war begins, law professor says (7m 28s)
Minneapolis skeptical of immigration leadership change
Video has Closed Captions
Clip: 1/27/2026 | 3m 12s | Minneapolis residents remain skeptical after immigration enforcement leadership change (3m 12s)
News Wrap: At least 42 deaths connected to winter storm
Video has Closed Captions
Clip: 1/27/2026 | 6m 23s | News Wrap: At least 42 deaths connected to massive winter storm (6m 23s)
Taiwan fears Maduro ouster may embolden China to invade
Video has Closed Captions
Clip: 1/27/2026 | 4m 58s | Taiwan fears U.S. ouster of Maduro may embolden China to mimic the move (4m 58s)
TikTok users allege censorship after U.S. ownership change
Video has Closed Captions
Clip: 1/27/2026 | 6m 16s | TikTok users say they are being censored after change to U.S. ownership (6m 16s)
Whistleblower responds after DOJ says DOGE mishandled data
Video has Closed Captions
Clip: 1/27/2026 | 9m 18s | Whistleblower responds after DOJ confirms DOGE mishandled Social Security data (9m 18s)
Providing Support for PBS.org
Learn Moreabout PBS online sponsorship
- News and Public Affairs

FRONTLINE is investigative journalism that questions, explains and changes our world.

- News and Public Affairs

BREAKING the DEADLOCK sparks bold, civil debate on America’s toughest issues.












Support for PBS provided by:
Major corporate funding for the PBS News Hour is provided by BDO, BNSF, Consumer Cellular, American Cruise Lines, and Raymond James. Funding for the PBS NewsHour Weekend is provided by...







