Our Land: New Mexico’s Environmental Past, Present and Future
Protecting Vulnerable Waterways
Season 4 Episode 10 | 11m 58sVideo has Closed Captions
Exploring a recent lawsuit against the EPA designed to protect intermittent waterways.
The pueblos of Jemez and Laguna filed a lawsuit in March against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency & others over a 2020 rule that weakens protections for ephemeral or intermittent waterways. According to the complaint, the Trump-era rule “ignores the U.S. Government’s trust responsibilities to Indian tribes and violates the Administrative Procedure Act and intent of the Clean Water Act."
Our Land: New Mexico’s Environmental Past, Present and Future is a local public television program presented by NMPBS
Our Land: New Mexico’s Environmental Past, Present and Future
Protecting Vulnerable Waterways
Season 4 Episode 10 | 11m 58sVideo has Closed Captions
The pueblos of Jemez and Laguna filed a lawsuit in March against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency & others over a 2020 rule that weakens protections for ephemeral or intermittent waterways. According to the complaint, the Trump-era rule “ignores the U.S. Government’s trust responsibilities to Indian tribes and violates the Administrative Procedure Act and intent of the Clean Water Act."
How to Watch Our Land: New Mexico’s Environmental Past, Present and Future
Our Land: New Mexico’s Environmental Past, Present and Future is available to stream on pbs.org and the free PBS App, available on iPhone, Apple TV, Android TV, Android smartphones, Amazon Fire TV, Amazon Fire Tablet, Roku, Samsung Smart TV, and Vizio.
Providing Support for PBS.org
Learn Moreabout PBS online sponsorship>> FUNDING FOR NEW MEXICO IN FOCUS PROVIDED BY THE MCCUNE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION AND VIEWERS LIKE YOU.
>> Gene: THIS WEEK ON NEW MEXICO IN FOCUS, TWO NEW MEXICO PUEBLOS ARE SUING THE FEDS OVER A TRUMP ERA WATER RULE THAT SETS ASIDE POLLUTION REGULATIONS.
>> Villa: REALLY WHAT IT IS ABOUT IS PROTECTING YOUR WATER AND MINE.
WATER IN JEMEZ RIVER AND WATERS IN THE RIO GRANDE.
WE HAVE SO LITTLE WATER IN NEW MEXICO.
>> Gene: SENATOR BEN RAY LUJAN JOINS US FROM WASHINGTON TO TALK ABOUT BOOSTING BROADBAND INTERNET ACCESS.
NEW MEXICO IN FOCUS STARTS NOW.
THANKS FOR JOINING US THIS WEEK.
I AM YOUR HOST GENE GRANT.
WE HAVE THOSE TWO REALLY MEATY INTERVIEWS THIS WEEK AND AS WITH EVERYTHING ON THE SHOW IF YOU MISS IT, WATCH ON OUR NEW MEXICO IN FOCUS YOUTUBE CHANNEL.
THE LINE OPINION PANEL IS HERE TOO AND WILL DIG INTO TWO BIG TOPICS THIS WEEK INCLUDING THE SPECIAL ELECTION AND HOW VOTERS ARE OR IN SOME CASES NOT CASTING BALLOTS.
ALBUQUERQUE JOURNAL REPORTED DEMOCRATS ARE SHOWING UP IN FAR GREATER NUMBERS THAN REPUBLICANS FOR EARLY VOTING BUT ONLY A SMALL PERCENTAGE HAVE VOTED SO FAR.
WE BEGIN WITH THE ISSUE THAT'S ON EVERYONE'S MIND AND NOT NECESSARILY THEIR FACE.
HERE IS THE LINE.
STATE OFFICIALS WASTED NO TIME IN RESPONDING TO THE NEW MASK RECOMMENDATION FROM THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL ON FRIDAY OF LAST WEEK.
HEALTH SECRETARY TRACI COLLINS UPDATED THE PUBLIC HEALTH ORDER TO REMOVE MASK REQUIREMENTS FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE FULLY VACCINATED IN ALL BUT A VERY FEW SCENARIOS.
BUSINESSES HAVE NOW RESPONDED WITH COMPANIES LIKE TARGET AND WALMART REMOVING MASK REQUIREMENTS AS WELL.
I THINK SMITHS IS IN THERE TOO SCHOOLS WILL CONTINUE TO REQUIRE FACE COVERINGS FOR THE REMAINDER OF THIS YEAR.
SO HERE TO TALK ABOUT WHAT IT ALL MEANS ON THIS WEEKS LINE OPINION PANEL.
WE WELCOME BACK DEDE FELDMAN, A LINE REGULAR AND FORMER STATE SENATOR.
ALSO WITH US THIS WEEK, KRISTELLE SIARZA OF SIARZA DIGITAL.
AND RETURNING TO THE PANEL THIS WEEK IS DAVE MULRYAN FROM THE GROUP EVERYBODY VOTES.
WELCOME TO YOU ALL.
I WANT TO START BY GOING AROUND THE TABLE AND GET YOUR PERSONAL OBSERVATIONS.
HAVE YOU SEEN A MAJOR DECLINE IN THE USE OF MASKS SINCE THE PUBLIC HEALTH ORDER WAS CHANGED AS YOU GO ABOUT YOUR DAILY LIVES.
DEDE START WITH YOU.
>> Dede: I DO SEE MANY MORE UNMASKED PEOPLE BUT YESTERDAY I DROVE THROUGH CORRALES AND STOPPED THERE AT FLYING STAR AND ALMOST EVERYONE WAS WEARING MASKS.
SO, I THINK IT IS VERY MIXED.
AND, OF COURSE, I DON'T SEE INSIDE OF PLACES WHICH IS WHAT I THINK THE CONCERN IS.
BUT, OUTDOORS, EVEN OUTDOORS PEOPLE ARE STILL WEARING THEIR MASKS.
>> Gene: WHAT ABOUT YOU?
YOU HAVE BEEN OUT AND ABOUT.
>> Dave: I WAS SURPRISED BY THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT CONTINUE TO WEAR MASKS AND I WAS -- I AM A PROPONENT.
THERE IS THIS IDEA IN HEALTHCARE WHERE YOU HAVE HARM REDUCTION AND IF YOU CAN WEAR A MASK AND EVEN IF YOU'RE VACCINATED, WE DON'T KNOW WHAT THE VARIANTS ARE, WHERE THEY ARE COMING FROM, AND, YOU KNOW, AS MY MOTHER WAS ALWAYS FOND OF SAYING, DON'T ASK FOR TROUBLE BECAUSE YOU'LL GET IT.
AND THE MASK TO ME IS THAT NOT THAT BIG OF A DEAL TO CONTINUE WEARING IT.
I NOTICE THE GYM THAT PEOPLE YOU DON'T HAVE TO WEAR THE MASK BUT ANY NUMBER OF PEOPLE WERE WEARING IT.
OF COURSE, YOU KNOW, THE IRONY IS THE PEOPLE WHO ARE GOING TO BE CONSCIENTIOUS AND WEAR THE MASK ARE PROBABLY THE PEOPLE WHO ARE ALSO VACCINATED.
SO, LOOK, WHEN I WAS A TEENAGE BOY ONCE AND I THOUGHT NOTHING COULD HAPPEN TO ME AND I WAS OUT RUNNING AROUND DOING THINGS THAT YOU DO WHEN YOU'RE THAT AGE, BUT, AGAIN, TO ME THAT JUST SAYS, I CAN ONLY TAKE CARE OF WHAT I CAN DO.
I AM GOING TO KEEP WEARING THE MASK AND PLUS IT HIDES MY NECK, WHAT CAN I SEE.
>> Gene: WE ALL HAVE OUR REASONS.
YOU'RE ALLOWED.
KRISTELLE, YOU TRAVEL A LOT OF CIRCLES OUT THERE, BUSINESS, PUBLIC, PRIVATE.
WHAT HAS THE LAST COUPLE OF WEEKS BEEN LIKE FOR YOU ON THE MASK?
>> Kristelle: VERY INTERESTING.
SO FROM THE SOCIAL SPORTS SIDE, GOLFERS ARE DEFINITELY NOT WEARING MASKS OUT THERE JUST BECAUSE OF THE OPEN AIR BUT WHEN YOU'RE IN THE BAR HAVING A COUPLE DRINKS YOU SEE THAT.
DEFINITELY THE CITY COURSES, THE GREAT CITY COURSES IN ALBUQUERQUE AND SOME OF THE PRIVATE CLUBS HAVE DEFINITELY BEEN ENFORCING THOSE MASK RULES.
WHENEVER -- KICKBALL IS GOING TO START PRETTY SOON AND DEFINITELY CLOSE CONTACT.
IT IS HARD TO EVEN COMPETE IN SPORTS WITH MASKS SO THAT IS A BIG THING.
I HAD A REALLY INTERESTING CONVERSATION WITH MY LEADERSHIP GROUP AND A LEADERSHIP OF OTHER BUSINESS OWNERS AND THOUGH WE TRY TO KEEP THINGS CONFIDENTIAL I CAN TELL YOU THAT A LOT OF US ARE STILL CONFUSED ON WHAT ARE WE SUPPOSED TO DO TO PROTECTS OUR EMPLOYEES?
HOW DO WE HELP OUR CUSTOMERS?
HAVE WE SEEN AREAS OF BUSINESS THAT ARE SUPER FLEXIBLE?
YOU KNOW.
HOW ARE THEY ACCIDENTALLY DEFYING THE GOVERNOR'S ORDERS?
I THINK IT IS CLARITY THAT IS NOT QUITE OUT IN THE COMMUNITY FROM AN ADMINISTRATIVE PERSPECTIVE OR OPERATIONAL INTENTION.
THAT IS WHAT IS CONFUSING ABOUT THE MASK PART.
IF I WAS TO TAKE A PERSONAL APPROACH, LIKE I THINK ABOUT MY MOM.
MY MOM IS PANCREATIC CANCER SURVIVOR AND SHE WAS ONE OF THE FIRST PEOPLE TO GET THE VACCINE BACK IN FEBRUARY AND BACK THEN SHE WOULD SAY, YOU KNOW IT SEEMS RIDICULOUS I HAVE TO WEAR A MASK IN 2019 TO JUMP ON A AIRPLANE TO TRAVEL INTERNATIONALLY BUT NOW I FEEL LIKE EVERYBODY IS STARTING TO LOOK LIKE ME WHEN IT COMES TO FLIGHTS.
SO, I AM WITH DAVE AND DEDE, WHATEVER IS MOST COMFORTABLE FOR THE INDIVIDUAL IS THE RIGHT CHOICE.
>> Gene: A QUESTION ABOUT THE GOVERNOR.
A LOT OF PEOPLE WERE SURPRISED BY THE STATE'S MOVE TO LOSE THE MASK MANDATE AFTER THEY HELD A HARD LINE IN TERMS OF MANY OTHER ASPECTS OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH ORDER.
DOES THAT PROVE WHAT THE GOVERNOR HAS BEEN SAYING ALL ALONG, SHE IS FOLLOWING THE SCIENCE OR WOULD SHE HAVE BEEN BETTER OFF WAITING TO DITCH THE MASKS UNTIL WE REACH THAT MAGICAL 60% VACCINATION STATE-WIDE WHICH SHE WAS TOUTING EARLIER?
>> Andy: IT DID SEEM LIKE A QUICK TURNAROUND JUST IN RESPONSE TO THE CDC GUIDELINES WHICH WERE ALSO INTRODUCED QUITE -- CHANGED QUITE QUICKLY.
AND I THINK THAT, YOU KNOW, I THINK SHE COULD HAVE WAITED A LITTLE BIT AND STUCK WITH THE PROGRAM THAT WE WERE DOING.
I WOULD HAVE BEEN MORE COMFORTABLE IF SHE WAITED UNTIL MAYBE MID JUNE WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN ACCELERATING THE TIMELINE A LITTLE BIT -- >> Gene: I HAVE GOT TO ASK YOU SENATOR, IS THAT POLITICALLY POSSIBLE, SHE COULD HAVE WAITED UNTIL MID JUNE WITH THE REST OF THE COUNTRY FLINGING OFF MASKS.
WOULD THAT HAVE HELD?
>> Dede: IT IS ALL IN THE DETAILS.
ABOUT THE INDOOR SPACES AND WHERE ARE MASKS STILL REQUIRED?
AND WHO IS ENFORCING THE MANDATES?
NOW, BUSINESSES MUST DETERMINE WHO IS UNVACCINATED AND WHO IS VACCINATED.
AND, YOU KNOW, THE HONOR SYSTEM -- THIS IS LIKE FALLING BACK ON THE HONOR SYSTEM.
AND THE HONOR SYSTEM, YOU KNOW, USUALLY REQUIRES TRUST AND WHAT WE HAVE BEEN SEEING IS AN EROSION OF TRUST.
TRUST IN ALL INSTITUTIONS AND IN ONE ANOTHER.
NOW, YOU KNOW, WE COULD SEE WHO WAS WEARING A MASK AND WHO WASN'T WEARING A MASK BEFORE.
BUT NOW WE DON'T KNOW WHETHER THOSE PEOPLE WHO ARE UNMASKED ARE VACCINATED OR NOT.
THAT CREATES A LITTLE BIT OF UNCERTAINTY.
>> Gene: I LIKE THAT LAST BIT.
IT IS UNCERTAIN WITH THAT IDEA.
WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT THIS, DOES THIS CHANGE, RAMP UP THE RHETORIC?
DO YOU THINK?
OR IS IT THE VITREAL THAT WE ARE GOING THROUGH ABOUT MASKS WILL ACTUALLY TAMP DOWN, YOU KNOW, AS ONE LESS THING ABOUT THE STATE'S COVID-19 RESPONSE FOR SOME PEOPLE.
WHAT IS YOUR SENSE OF IT?
>> Dave: MY SENSE IS A COUPLE OF THINGS.
ONE, I THINK THAT THE CDC, I THINK THEY WERE PREMATURE, BUT I DON'T HAPPEN TO HAVE A PHD IN BIOCHEMISTRY SO I'LL LEAVE THE DECISION TO THEM.
I ALSO THINK POLITICIANS AND NOT JUST THE GOVERNOR, BUT POLITICIANS IN GENERAL, THE MASK BECAME A METAPHOR FOR HOW WE WERE IN THE EPIDEMIC AND SOMEHOW REMOVING THE MASK IS TO MEANT TO MAKE PEOPLE FEEL BETTER.
WE HAVE ATTAINED A BIG GOAL.
NEW MEXICO HAS DONE A GREAT JOB.
WE ARE NO.
1 IN TERMS OF GETTING PEOPLE VACCINATED.
ALSO I BELIEVE THERE IS GOVERNOR-TO-GOVERNOR PEER PRESSURE.
IF ONE STATE IS GOING TO DO IT, THEN THEY FEEL LIKE THEY HAVE TO DO IT.
CALIFORNIA SAID THEY ARE NOT DOING THE MASK MANDATE OR DROPPING THE MANDATE UNTIL MID JUNE.
THEY GOT QUITE A BIT OF PUSHBACK.
WELL, WE WANT TO GET RID OF THE MASKS RIGHT NOW.
I AM GOING TO CONTINUE TO USE THE MASK.
I WOULD ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO USE THE MASK.
THAT THINK THAT ALWAYS CAUGHT MY ATTENTIONS IS WE BASICALLY HAD NO FLU SEASON BECAUSE PEOPLE WERE BUSY WEARING MASKS.
SAY TO YOURSELF, OKAY, SO I'LL JUST WEAR A MASK AND I AM A PERSON IN CHINA IN THE 1970'S AND 80'S AND I AM WEARING A MASK FOR SMOG, BUT THAT KIND REALLY HAS TO GET YOUR ATTENTION.
WE SIMPLY ELIMINATED THE FLU BECAUSE PEOPLE WERE MASKED AND THEY WEREN'T GETTING TOGETHER IN ALL SORTS OF GROUPS.
BUT YOU HAVE TO SAY THAT CAN'T BE A BAD THING, RIGHT?
>> Gene: RELATED TO THE MASK MANDATE IS VACCINATIONS.
WE HAVE TO TALK ABOUT THAT.
UNM RELEASED A POLICY A LITTLE WHILE BACK AND TAKING FEEDBACK RIGHT NOW.
THE POLICY WOULD REQUIRE FULL VACCINATION FOR THOSE RETURNING TO CAMPUS WITH FEW EXCEPTIONS.
A LOT OF PLACES WEIGHING OPTIONS HERE BUT WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THAT IDEA?
IS THIS THE BEST WAY TO GO MOVING FORWARD?
>> Kristelle: I AM NOT AN ADMINISTRATOR SO I'M NOT GOING TO EVEN PRETEND TO ANSWER THAT QUESTIONS CORRECTLY.
I WILL TELL YOU A SCENARIO THAT HAPPENED TO ONE OF OUR CLIENTS ABOUT TWO YEARS AGO.
LEWIS UNIVERSITY HAD ACTUALLY CANCELED A GRADUATION AT MAIN CAMPUS BECAUSE OF, I BELIEVE, A MEASLES OUTBREAK.
I AM SORRY, MUMPS OUTBREAK.
AND MUMPS OUTBREAK WAS BECAUSE OF POOR VACCINATION RECORDS ON THE EDUCATION FRONT OR ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE FRONT, CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE AREA AND THE FIRST, YOU KNOW, BACK IN 2018, 2019 WHEN WE HEARD OF A MUMPS OUTBREAK, WE WERE GOING, WHAT?
MUMPS IN A 21 YEAR OLD?
THIS WAS LEWIS UNIVERSITY WAS IN ROMEOVILLE, ILLINOIS AND HERE WE ARE NOW ASKING OURSELVES IS UNM GOING TO BE REQUIRING VACCINATION RECORDS, BUT IF I AM NOT MISTAKEN EVERY SCHOOL AND EVERY PRIVATE INSTITUTION THAT I EVER ENROLLED MY SON IN, THEY ALWAYS ASK FOR VACCINATION RECORDS FOR THE SAFETY AND STUART OF THE STUDENTS.
SO, IF UNM DECIDES TO MAKE A MANDATE LIKE THAT, OBVIOUSLY THE INTENTION IS NOT DISRUPT THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS BECAUSE OF HUMAN CHOICE.
IT IS OBVIOUSLY TO KEEP EVERYBODY SAFE AND HEALTH, KEEP THE COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY EXPERIENCE THE SAME.
IF THEY GO THROUGH A DECISION LIKE THAT IT IS NOT UNCOMMON AND THE CASE IN POINT WAS LEWIS UNIVERSITY IN ROMEOVILLE, ILLINOIS.
>> Gene: DO YOU HAVE A THOUGHT ON THAT?
>> Dede: I THINK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES ALL OVER THE COUNTRY ARE CONSIDERING THIS NOW AND THEY HAVE A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE AMERICAN HEALTH ASSOCIATION THAT IT SHOULD BE A REQUIREMENT COME THE FALL FOR COLLEGES TO GET BACK INTO FULL SWING AND I THINK THAT LIKE, FOR EXAMPLE, THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SYSTEM IS DOING IT.
I KNOW FORT LEWIS COLLEGE IS DOING IT.
I KNOW THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, ALSO, MY ALMA MATER, REQUIRES THOSE VACCINATIONS.
OF COURSE, THERE ARE ALWAYS THE WAIVERS, YOU KNOW, IF YOU HAVE A MEDICAL CONDITION AND EVEN IF YOU HAVE A RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION I THINK.
AND KRISTELLE THAT WAS PROBABLY -- IT IS TRUE IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AS WELL.
SO, I THINK, YOU KNOW, I THINK THAT IT PROBABLY, YOU KNOW, WOULD BE A WISE THING TO DO ALTHOUGH I THINK IT WOULD BE CONTROVERSIAL AND, ONCE AGAIN, WHO ENFORCES ALL OF THIS?
>> Gene: THANK YOU, EXACTLY RIGHT.
DAVE 20 SECONDS FOR A LAST WORD ON THAT QUESTION.
>> Dave: LET ME SUM IT UP.
VAC OR DIE.
I THINK PEOPLE SHOULD BE VACCINATED.
INSTITUTIONS THAT ARE IN A POSITION TO HELP US GET MORE PEOPLE VACCINATED SHOULD DO SO.
IT IS CLEAR THE VACCINES WORK.
WE HAVE SEEN THIS DRAMATIC DROP IN CASES.
SURE GET THE VACCINATION, REQUIRE THE VACCINATION.
YOU ARE HELPING YOURSELF AND YOU ARE HELPING EVERYONE AROUND YOU MANY.
>> Gene: THERE YOU GO.
THE CONVERSATION ON MASKS AND VACCINATION REQUIREMENTS CONTINUES ON LINE.
JOIN US ON FACEBOOK OR OUR FACEBOOK PAGE FOCUS ON NEW MEXICO AND SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON THE ISSUE.
BACK TO DISCUSS SPECIAL ELECTION IN THE FIRST CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT AND START OF SAME DAY VOTER REGISTRATION HERE IN NEW MEXICO.
>> Toya: WE GO FISHING AND THE FISH THAT WE CATCH IN THE JEMEZ RIVER IS WHAT WE EAT.
ONE OTHER IMPORTANT FACTOR IS THAT THE WATER IN THE JEMEZ RIVER IS USED IN CEREMONIES.
AND, THIS IS A THREAT TO OR WAY OF LIFE.
>> Gene: BEN RAY LUJAN IS COMING UP ON HIS FIVE-MONTH ANNIVERSARY AS NEW MEXICO'S JUNIOR SENATOR.
HE WALKED INTO A RAZOR THIN MAJORITY FOR DEMOCRATS IN THE U.S. SENATE, WITH THE VICE PRESIDENT ABLE TO CAST A TIE-BREAKING VOTE.
SENATOR BRINGS SOME OF HIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE PRIORITIES WITH HIM AS WELL AS TAKING ON BROADER ISSUES SUCH AS IMMIGRATION.
HERE IS CORRESPONDENT RUSSELL CONTRERAS WHO SPOKE WITH THE SENATOR THIS WEEK.
>> Russell: SENATOR BEN RAY LUJAN, THANK YOU FOR JOINING US ON NEW MEXICO IN FOCUS.
WE REALLY APPRECIATE IT.
>> Lujan: ALWAYS AN HONOR.
GOOD TO BE WITH YOU TODAY.
>> Russell: YOU HAVE BEEN IN OFFICE JUST A FEW MONTHS NOW.
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE SENATE AND HOUSE AFTER A DECADE IN THE HOUSE AND SOME YEARS IN HOUSE LEADERSHIP?
ARE YOU FAMILIARIZING YOURSELF WITH THE NEW BODY?
HOW IS IT GOING?
>> Lujan: THERE A LOT OF SIMILARITIES.
YOU HAVE TO GET TO KNOW YOUR COLLEAGUES, MAKE SURE YOU MEET THEM ONE ON ONE AND GET A CHANCE TO WORK WITH THEM AND THEIR TEAMS.
THAT IS SOMETHING I HAVE APPRECIATED EVEN WITH CALLINGS WHERE WE HAD DISAGREEMENTS IN COMMITTEE AND DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO GETTING TO THE SAME GOAL, AFTERWARD I HAVE THE HONOR TO SIT DOWN AND TALK TO MY COLLEAGUES MAKING SURE WE ARE ON A GOOD PATH AND WE'RE ABLE TO WORK TOGETHER.
THERE ARE DIFFERENT RULES OF ENGAGEMENT, IF YOU WILL.
THERE IS DIFFERENT PROCEDURES AND RULES THAT GOVERN BOTH BODIES.
SO THAT HAS BEEN SOMETHING THAT I HAVE BEEN SPENDING TIME LEARNING AND UNDERSTANDING.
BUT, HAVE VERY MUCH APPRECIATED THE SUPPORT I RECEIVED FROM MY COLLEAGUES AND VOTES THAT WE HAVE BEEN ABLE TO EARN TO PASS IMPORTANT PIECES OF LEGISLATION INCLUDING DIRECTING 17 BILLION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL LABS FOR THE SCIENCE AND TECH DIRECTOR RECENTLY.
AGAIN VERY MUCH APPRECIATE GETTING A CHANCE TO MEET PEOPLE, WORK WITH PEOPLE AND MAKE A DIFFERENCE FOR THE PEOPLE OF NEW MEXICO.
>> Russell: WHEN YOU AND I LAST SPOKE, YOU MADE IT CLEAR YOU WANTED TO REACH ACROSS THE AISLE WITH REPUBLICANS TO WORK ON VARIOUS PROPOSALS.
YOU AND GOP SENATOR RICK SCOTT OF FLORIDA ARE WORKING ON A LAW CALLED THE RIDER ACT THAT ATTEMPTS TO ATTACK DRUNKEN DRIVING.
TELL US ABOUT THAT LAW.
>> Lujan: REDUCE IMPAIRED DRIVING FOR EVERYONE, THE RIDE ACT.
I HAVE THE HONOR OF WORKING WITH SENATOR SCOTT WITH.
IT IS A PIECE OF LEGISLATION THAT WAS ALWAYS CHAMPIONED BY OUR OWN SENATOR IN NEW MEXICO, TOM UDALL.
RUSS, IT IS A STORY THAT I DON'T SHARE OFTEN AND NOW THAT WE ARE WORKING ON THIS LEGISLATION I HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT IT MORE.
29 YEARS AGO, THE LESS THAN HALF A MILE FROM MY HOME IN NAMBE I WAS DRIVING HOME ONE NIGHT AND A DRUNK DRIVER HIT ME HEAD ON.
AND I AM FORTUNATE THAT I AM HERE TO TELL THE STORY AND TALK ABOUT IT TODAY.
FOR A LONG TIME ALL I WOULD SEE WAS HEADLIGHTS COMING RIGHT AT ME ANY TIME I CLOSED MY EYES, WHETHER IT WAS DAY OR NIGHT.
TOO MANY FAMILIES HAVE BEEN LOST, SO MANY FAMILIES THAT ARE VICTIMS OF DRUNK DRIVERS ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE ROAD, WHICH IS WHAT HAPPENED TO ME ON THAT STATE ROAD IN NAMBE, BUT EVEN ON INTERSTATES.
AND WE RECENTLY LOST SOMEONE IN NEW MEXICO AND IT HAPPENS ACROSS AMERICA EVERYDAY.
THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION WHICH REQUIRES AUTO MANUFACTURERS TO INCLUDE READILY AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY TO PREVENT AND STOP DRUNK DRIVING ACCIDENTS ACROSS AMERICA.
IT IS SOMETHING THAT WE ARE GROWING MORE AND MORE MOMENTUM WITH.
THERE IS STRONG BIPARTISAN SUPPORT.
EVEN MY COLLEAGUES FROM MICHIGAN NOW HAVE BECOME CO-SPONSORS AND ADVOCATING FOR THE LEGISLATION.
I JUST JUMPED OFF A HEARING IN THE COMMERCE COMMITTEE AS WELL WHERE PART OF MY LINE OF QUESTIONING WAS ABOUT GETTING SUPPORT FOR THE RIDE ACT.
THIS IS READILY AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY, IT WILL SAVE PEOPLES LIVES AND IS COMMON SENSE.
HERE IS WHAT SUMS IT UP.
IF AUTO MANUFACTURERS ACROSS AMERICA ARE ASKING FOR WAIVERS TO LIABILITY FOR SELF-DRIVING FULLY AUTOMATED SELF-DRIVING CARS, WHY CAN'T THEY INCLUDE THIS TECHNOLOGY?
THERE SHOULD NOT BE A RELUCTANCE.
I AM GOING TO KEEP PUSHING UNTIL WE GET THIS DONE.
>> Russell: YOU RAN ON THE ENVIRONMENT DURING YOUR CAMPAIGN.
AS OF RIGHT NOW, TULAROSA DOWN WINDERS FROM THE TRINITY TEST, THE WORLDS FIRST ATOMIC BOMB TEST, HAVEN'T BEEN INCLUDED IN THE RADIATION COMPENSATION ACT.
THAT LAW IS SET TO SUNSET NEXT YEAR.
WHAT ARE THE CHANCES OF EXTENDING THAT LAW AND INCLUDING FOLKS FROM TULAROSA AND MESCALERO APACHE.
>> Lujan: I AM WORKING DILIGENTLY TO GET THE RADIATION EXPOSURE COMPENSATION ACT EXTENDED, WHICH EXPIRES AT THE END OF 2022.
YOU POINT OUT SOMETHING THAT NO ONE HAS BEEN ABLE TO GIVE ME A GOOD ANSWER WITH WHY THE PEOPLE OF TULAROSA, WHERE THE FIRST BOMB WAS TESTED WITH THE TRINITY TEST SITE ON AMERICAN SOIL, WHEN OTHER COUNTIES ACROSS AMERICA HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE DOWNWIND WHERE NUCLEAR TESTING TOOK PLACE.
HOW CAN IT BE THAT TWO COMMUNITIES ESPECIALLY IN NEW MEXICO, IN TULAROSA AND OUT IN CHURCH ROCK, MCKINLEY COUNTY, THAT IS WHERE THE BERM BROKE BACK IN 1979 AND THOSE URANIUM TAILINGS WENT FLOODING INTO ARROYOS CONTAMINATING STREAMS AND ARROYOS AND WATERWAYS, SHEEP AND CATTLE AND PEOPLE, HOW COULD THEY BE LEFT OUT?
OPEN RADIUM PIT MINING AROUND LAGUNA ACOMA PUEBLOS, HOW ARE THEY NOT INCLUDED.
I HAVE BEEN RAISING THIS ISSUE WITH MY COLLEAGUES.
AT THE VERY LEAST THIS PROGRAM NEEDS TO BE EXTENDED, NO.
1.
THERE SHOULD BE AN APOLOGY ISSUED BY THE UNITED STATES AND I WAS ABLE TO GET THAT INCLUDED IN THE HOUSE NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT, BUT IT DIDN'T MAKE IT THROUGH THE SENATE CONFERENCE COMMITTEE.
NOW I AM IN THE SENATE AND I AM GOING TO WORK DILIGENTLY TO GET THAT DONE AND INCLUDE AS MANY PROVISIONS AS WE CAN WITH RECA.
I'LL NEVER FORGET THE VOICE OF AN ELDER NAVAJO WOMAN WHO TESTIFIED HERE IN WASHINGTON, D.C. ON THE RADIATION EXPOSURE COMPENSATION ACT.
AND SHE ASKED MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, ARE YOU ALL WAITING FOR US TO DIE SO THE PROBLEM GOES AWAY?
THINK OF HOW PROFOUND THAT IS.
WE HAVE LOST LOVED ONES THROUGH THE LAST MANY MONTHS AND YEARS.
IT IS NOT RIGHT.
THIS IS A LIABILITY FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND THE UNITED STATES NEEDS TO DO RIGHT BY EVERY URANIUM MINER NOT INCLUDED IN THE ORIGINAL RECA AND ALL THE COMMUNITIES THAT WERE EXCLUDED FROM DOWNWIND STATUS THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN INCLUDED FROM THE VERY BEGINNING.
>> Russell: NEW MEXICO IS A STATE THAT CONTINUES TO STRUGGLE WITH POVERTY.
YOU AND I HAVE TALKED ABOUT THAT IN THE PAST.
YOUR STAFF AND COLLEAGUES SAY IF YOU TALK TO SENATOR LUJAN HE WILL TALK YOUR EAR OFF ABOUT BROADBAND.
YOU BELIEVE BROADBAND COULD BE THE CENTER OF CONNECTING NEW MEXICO AND IMPROVING THIS ECONOMY.
WHY IS BROADBAND CONNECTION SO IMPORTANT TO YOU?
>> Lujan: THERE ARE MANY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS AND LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVES THAT HAVE TO BE ADOPTED TO ADDRESS POVERTY THROUGHOUT NEW MEXICO AND ACROSS AMERICA.
ONE OF THOSE THAT WAS INCLUDED RECENTLY WAS THE EXPANSION OF THE CHILD TAX CREDIT WHICH FAMILIES ARE SLATED TO START TO SEE IN THEIR BANK ACCOUNTS NOW IN JULY.
THAT IS IMPORTANT AND WE ARE WORKING TO MAKE THAT PERMANENT.
THAT IS NO.
1.
BUT BRAND BAND IS A GAME CHANGER FOR SO MANY PARTS OF THE UNITED STATES AND ESPECIALLY NEW MEXICO THAT ARE NOT CONNECTED WITH FAST AFFORDABLE INTERNET.
SO MANY OF US KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SLOW INTERNET, FAST INTERNET OR NO INTERNET.
AND IT IS SIMPLY UNACCEPTABLE.
WHEN YOU CAN GET ON AN AIRPLANE AND STAY CONNECTED AT 30,000 FLEET AND FLY ACROSS AMERICA CONNECTED TO THE INTERNET AT FASTER SPEEDS THAN YOU CAN IN COMMUNITIES YOU'RE FLYING ABOVE OR EVEN AT THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION, WE IN THE UNITED STATES CAN SOLVE THIS PROBLEM.
AND THAT IS WHY I HAVE BEEN WORKING DILIGENTLY TO INCLUDE ROBUST FUNDING FOR BROAD BAND IN THE INFRASTRUCTURE PACKAGE THAT IS COMING UP.
PRESIDENT BIDEN HAS INCLUDED IT IN HIS PROPOSAL WITH THE AMERICANS JOB PLANS AS WELL THAT HE PRESENTED TO THE U.S. SENATE AND U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
I AM WORKING ON SEVERAL LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVES AND PROUD TO CHAIR THE SUBCOMMITTEE THAT HAS JURISDICTION OVER BROADBAND DEPLOYMENT, FCC AS WELL.
WE ARE ABLE TO LIFT UP PEOPLES VOICES ACROSS NEW MEXICO TO MAKE SURE WE ARE NOT LEFT OUT.
HERE IS WHAT IT COMES DOWN TO.
THERE IS A SOPHOMORE THAT ATTENDS CUBA HIGH SCHOOL.
HER NAME IS HELENE.
SHE LIVES OUT IN COUNSELOR, NEW MEXICO.
SHE IS NAVAJO.
SHE DOES NOT HAVE ELECTRICITY AT HER HOME.
SHE DOES NOT HAVE A BROADBAND CORRECTION, SHE DEPENDS ON WIRELESS PHONE BUT THAT WIRELESS PHONE HAS FIXED CAPS ON DATA.
SO THE FAMILY IS VERY LEERY OF USING THAT PHONE SO SHE HAS ENOUGH BAND WIDTH TO DO HER HOMEWORK.
IT TAKES HER ALMOST TWO HOURS TO GET TO SCHOOL EVERYDAY.
IF WE CAN DO RIGHT BY HELENE, GET BY WIFI ON THE SCHOOL BUS, MAKE SURE SHE HAS A CONNECTION AT HOME, THAT SHE DOESN'T HAVE DATA CAPS CONNECTED TO HER MOBILE DEVICE AND WE CAN GET HER ELECTRICITY, RUNNING, RUNNING WATER AND WASTEWATER, THEN WE ARE DOING RIGHT.
I AM DOING THIS THROUGH THE LENS OF WHAT I LEARNED FROM HELENE, THIS BRAVE 16 YEAR OLD SOPHOMORE THAT HAS PARTICIPATED IN HEARINGS AND TESTIMONY ALREADY AND THAT IS A VOICE THAT WE NEED TO CONTINUE TO LIFT UP AND LEARN FROM.
>> Russell: DEMOCRATS HAVE A TINY MAJORITY IN THE SENATE.
MANY OF THE PROGRESSIVE WISH LIST ITEMS COMING FROM THE HOUSE WON'T MAKE IT THROUGH THIS DIVIDED BODY.
AS WE TALK RIGHT NOW, SENATOR TIM SCOTT MENTIONED EARLIER IS WORKING ON A COMPREHENSIVE POLICE REFORM BILL.
IT IS IN NEGOTIATIONS RIGHT NOW.
WOULD THIS, TO PASS MUSTER FOR YOU, WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE IN THAT PACKAGE?
>> Lujan: I THINK THERE IS PROGRESS BEING MADE FROM SENATOR BOOKER WORKING WITH SENATOR TIM SCOTT AS WELL AS KAREN BASS, FORMER CHAIR OF THE CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS AND STILL A MEMBER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS WELL.
I JUST TALKED TO BOTH SENATOR BOOKER AND TO KAREN ABOUT PROGRESS THEY ARE MAKING AND I NEED TO CHECK IN WITH SENATOR SCOTT, BUT I WAS OPTIMISTIC WHAT THEY SHARED WITH ME.
LOOK, WE WANT TO MAKE SURE WE ARE BRINGING ATTENTION TO THE INJUSTICES IN OUR COMMUNITIES AND THAT WE ARE ABLE TO IMPLEMENT A POLICY THAT WE CAN GET SUPPORTED AND SIGNED INTO LAW.
THAT IS WHAT THEY ARE TRYING TO GET DONE IN THE SENATE WITH SUPPORT OF KAREN.
I PROUDLY SUPPORTED LEGISLATION IN THE PAST OUT OF THE HOUSE WITH THE GEORGE FLOYD POLICING ACT, A PIECE OF LEGISLATION THAT ALSO ALREADY PASSED THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
THAT FRAMEWORK IS SOMETHING THAT IS IMPORTANT FOR US TO BE CONSIDERING AND LOOKING AT AS WE ARE ABLE TO MAKE THESE CHANGES, SOME OF WHICH ARE ALREADY ADOPTED IN NEW MEXICO.
SO, AGAIN, LOOKING TO SEE WHAT CORY AND TIM AND KAREN WILL COME UP WITH, BUT WE TRUST THEM TO COME UP WITH A STRONG PACKAGE AND I JUST APPRECIATE THEM WILLING TO WORK TOGETHER ACROSS THE AISLE FOR THE GOOD OF AMERICA.
>> Russell: SAME COULD BE SAID ABOUT IMMIGRATION REFORM.
WE HAVE BEEN TRYING TO PASS FOR TWO DECADES NOW.
ARE YOU OPTIMISTIC WE CAN GET SOMETHING THROUGH THE SENATE BY 2022?
>> Lujan: I AM OPTIMISTIC BUT IT COMES WITH THIS.
IT IS CLEAR TO ME THAT MANY OF MY REPUBLICAN COLLEAGUES HAVE CHOSEN TO MAKE THIS POLITICAL WITH IMMIGRATION REFORM.
AND IT IS NOT IN THE INTERESTS OF FOLKS THAT WANT TO USE THIS AS A WEDGE ISSUE TO TRY TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM.
WHERE I AM ENCOURAGED ARE SEVERAL OF MY REPUBLICAN COLLEAGUES HAVE BEEN WILLING TO SIT DOWN AND IN A BIPARTISAN BASIS, TO BE ABLE TO FIND IDEAS AND SOLUTIONS.
I AM HOPING THAT MORE MEMBERS IN THE HOUSE AND THE SENATE, DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN, TAKE A LOOK AT MEMBERS THAT ARE TRYING TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM.
THE DREAM AND PROMISE ACT ALREADY PASSED HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AGAIN THIS YEAR WITH A BIPARTISAN SUPPORT.
DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN MEMBERS SUPPORTING IT.
THE FARM WORKER MODERNIZATION ACT PASSED WITH 30 REPUBLICANS IN THE HOUSE SUPPORTING IT.
THERE IS NO QUESTION THAT THEY HAVE THE VOTES TO PASS HERE IN THE SENATE.
AND I HAVE BEEN CONTINUING TO RAISE THIS ISSUE NOT JUST WITH THE WHITE HOUSE, PERSONALLY MEETING WITH FELLOW CONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS, COLLEAGUES IN THE OVAL OFFICE, PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT, AS WELL AS SENATE COLLEAGUES.
WE MEET ON A WEEKLY BASIS IF NOT A COUPLE TIMES A WEEK.
AND THERE IS A BIPARTISAN GROUP GETTING TOGETHER TO TRY TO GROW MORE SUPPORT.
I AM OPTIMISTIC WE CAN GET SOMETHING DONE.
WE MUST GET SOMETHING DONE.
IT IS NOT JUST GOOD FOR AMERICA, THIS IS GOOD FOR OUR ECONOMY AS WELL.
AND, IT WILL KEEP PEOPLE SAFER, MAKE PEOPLE SAFER.
IT WILL TREAT PEOPLE WITH DIGNITY AND RESPECT.
AGAIN, IT IS GOING TO BE A CRITICAL COMPONENT OF GROWING OUR ECONOMY AND GDP.
>> Russell: IN THE FEW SECONDS WE HAVE WITH YOU, THE SENATE SOMETIMES CAN BE A PLACE WHERE YOU GO AND WHERE DREAMS DIE.
YOU SEE THE POLARIZATION BUT YOU SEE A LOT OF COLLEGIALITY.
AS YOU SPENT TIME IN THE SENATE JUST THIS PAST FEW WEEKS, ARE YOU MORE OPTIMISTIC ABOUT AMERICA OR HAVE YOU TURNED MORE PESSIMISTIC?
>> Lujan: I AM ALWAYS OPTIMISTIC.
I THINK PEOPLE WANT TO SOLVE PROBLEMS AND GET THINGS DONE.
MY EXPERIENCE IN THE SENATE, THE EXAMPLE THAT I SHARED WITH YOU AS WE ARE WORKING TOGETHER IN A BIPARTISAN BILL TO INCREASE AMERICA'S COMPETITIVENESS.
WE JUST SAW ANNOUNCEMENT BY INTEL WITH A THREE-AND-A-HALF BILLION DOLLAR INVESTMENT IN THE NEW MEXICO FACILITY OUT IN RIO RANCHO.
WE NEED TO BE AGGRESSIVE WHEN IT COMES TO CHIP MANUFACTURING AND ADVANCES WITH SPACE AND OTHER SCIENCE AND TECH AND RESEARCH.
I WAS ABLE TO PASS AN AMENDMENT THAT INVESTED AND AUTHORIZED 17 BILLION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY.
OUR NATIONAL LABS IN NEW MEXICO WILL BENEFIT.
LOS ALAMOS AND SANDIA WITH THE RESEARCH THEY ARE DOING, AND I DID THIS WITH STRONG BIPARTISAN SUPPORT.
I HAD ONE MORE, I BELIEVE, REPUBLICAN VOTE IN COMMITTEE THAN I DID A DEMOCRATIC VOTE.
AND WE ARE NOW BRINGING THIS TO FLOOR AND PASSING THIS LEGISLATION NEXT WEEK OUT OF THE U.S. SENATE.
THAT IS JUST ONE EXAMPLE WHERE WE CAN COME TOGETHER TO RESPOND TO COMPETITIVE CHALLENGES ESPECIALLY WITH THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT WITH WHAT THEY ARE DOING AND MAKE SURE THE UNITED STATES IS GOING TO CONTINUE TO BE A LEADER IN THE WORLD WHEN IT COMES TO THESE ISSUES.
THAT IS JUST ONE EXAMPLE.
EVEN WHEN THERE WAS DISAGREEMENT AND MY REPUBLICAN COLLEAGUES NOT A ONE SUPPORTED THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN, WHAT WE SAW WAS WE WERE ABLE TO COME TOGETHER TO BE ABLE TO RESPOND TO AMERICA'S NEEDS AND TO PASS A PACKAGE THAT PROVIDED MORE FINANCIAL SUPPORT INTO THE POCKETS OF HARD WORKING MIDDLE CLASS AMERICANS AND TO MAKE SURE WE HAD VACCINE TO GET INTO PEOPLES ARMS.
THAT IS ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF HOW WE WORK TOGETHER AND STILL WORK ON POLICY.
SOME OF WHICH WERE REPUBLICAN IDEAS INCLUDED IN THAT PACKAGE.
UNFORTUNATELY THEY DIDN'T VOTE FOR THE FINAL PACKAGE BUT THEY HELPED TO SHAPE IT.
THAT IS A POSITIVE RESPONSE AND IT SHOWS ME THAT WE CAN RESPOND, WE CAN WORK TOGETHER AND WE CAN CONTINUE TO WORK TO BRING THE COUNTRY TOGETHER.
>> Russell: FINALLY, I KNOW YOU HAVE ONLY BEEN THERE A FEW MONTHS, BUT ARE YOU RUNNING FOR REELECTION?
>> Lujan: I AM JUST GETTING STARTED HERE WITH WORKING WITH MY COLLEAGUES AND REACHING OUT TO FELLOW NEW MEXICANS AND JUST GIVE ME A CHANCE, WE ARE STILL FIVE YEARS AWAY.
AND IF THE PEOPLE OF NEW MEXICO ENCOURAGE ME TO CONTINUE TO WORK ON THEIR BEHALF, IT IS DEFINITELY A RESPONSIBILITY I'LL CONTINUE TO EMBRACE.
THERE IS A WHOLE LOT MORE THAT I HAVE TO LEARN FROM FELLOW NEW MEXICANS; SOLVE THESE CHALLENGES AND PROBLEMS BUT RIGHT NOW WE ARE WORKING DILIGENTLY TO GET INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENTS BACK HOME TO CLOSE THIS BROAD BAND GAP AND CREATE MORE JOB OPPORTUNITIES.
SO THE MORE ANNOUNCEMENTS WE HAVE, THE MORE BUILD OUT WE HAVE, THE BETTER NEW MEXICO WILL BE.
AND IT IS REALLY THE RESPONSIBILITY FROM ALL OF US, YOU KNOW, WHAT I ALWAYS REMIND FOLKS BACK HOME, WHAT I LEARNED FROM COLLEAGUES, CORY BOOKER, SHE REMINDS US THAT CHANGE DOES NOT COME FROM WASHINGTON D.C., IT COMES TO WASHINGTON D.C. FROM ACROSS AMERICA AND IT IS OUR RESPONSIBILITY TO CARRY THOSE VOICE.
CONTINUE TO BE PROUD TO REPRESENT THE PEOPLE OF NEW MEXICO AND I'LL BE ONE OF FOUR DEMOCRATIC HISPANIC SENATORS IN THE SENATE, BUILDING OFF THAT WORK AND LEGACY BROUGHT TO US BY ONE OF OUR VERY OWN, DENNIS CHAVEZ, WHO DID INCREDIBLE WORK AND FOUGHT FOR THE UNDERDOG BUT DROVE INVESTMENTS INTO NEW MEXICO.
AND SO I AM LEARNING ABOUT HIM EVERYDAY AS WELL AND MAKING SURE THAT I AM ABLE TO LIVE UP TO THE EXPECTATIONS THAT HE SET FORTH FOR NOT JUST OUR STATE BUT FOR US TO DELIVER FOR THE PEOPLE BACK HOME.
>> Russell: SENATOR BEN RAY LUJAN, WHEN YOU'RE READY TO MAKE THAT ANNOUNCEMENT, WE'LL BE READY HERE AT NEW MEXICO IN FOCUS.
THANK YOU FOR JOINING US.
WE APPRECIATE YOU JOINING US.
>> Lujan: THANK YOU, ALWAYS AN HONOR, SIR.
>> Gene: VOTING IS ALREADY UNDER WAY IN THE RACE TO REPLACE DEB HAALAND IN THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND SPECIAL ELECTION IS ALSO ON THE DEBUT OF THE SAME-DAY VOTER REGISTRATION HERE IN NEW MEXICO.
LAWMAKERS APPROVED THE PRACTICE IN 2019 BUT IT ROLLED OUT EARLIER THAN EXPECTED BECAUSE OF MS. HAALAND'S APPOINTMENT AS SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR EARLIER THIS YEAR.
WE HAVE INTERVIEWS WITH ALL THE MAJOR PARTY CANDIDATES UP ON OUR WEBSITE AT NEW MEXICO IN FOCUS.ORG.
LET'S START HERE.
MANY STATES INCLUDING GEORGIA AND ARIZONA ARE LOOKING TO RESTRICT VOTING ACCESS IN THE WAKE OF 2020 ELECTION.
WE SEEM TO BE HEADED IN THE OTHER DIRECTION IN NEW MEXICO AS SAME-DAY VOTER REGISTRATION SHOWS.
DEDE, STATE SENATOR, WHAT DO YOU THINK IS BEHIND THAT?
WHY ARE WE SO DIFFERENT.
>> Dede: NEW MEXICO HAS ALWAYS BEEN VERY PROGRESSIVE WHEN IT COMES TO VOTING RIGHTS AND VOTING ACCESS.
NOT ONLY ARE WE MOVING TOWARD SAME-DAY REGISTRATION BUT WE HAVE ONLINE VOTER REGISTRATION.
WE HAVE A VERY EXPANSIVE EARLY VOTING PERIOD.
SOME STATES ONLY HAVE THREE DAYS AND THEY ARE TRYING TO RESTRICT IT.
WE HAVE VOTING CONVENIENCE CENTERS WHERE YOU CAN GO ANYWHERE IN ALBUQUERQUE AND GET A BALLOT PARTICULAR TO YOU.
AND THAT MAKES IT VERY CONVENIENT.
AND WE HAVE GOT A LOT OF OTHER THINGS TO MAKE VOTING MORE ACCESSIBLE TO EVERYONE.
WE HAVE USED DROP BOXES OUT IN RURAL AREAS WHERE THE MAIL IS UNCERTAIN.
BUT, THIS TIME WE HAD A SPECIAL SESSION OF THE LEGISLATURE AND COUNTY CLERKS WERE ALLOWED TO MAIL ABSENTEE APPLICATIONS TO VOTERS SO THAT THEY DIDN'T HAVE TO ENDANGER THEIR HEALTH BY GOING TO THE POLLING PLACES.
SO, WE HAVE HAD A VERY PROGRESSIVE RECORD HERE.
WE WERE ONE OF THE FIRST STATES TO GO BACK TO PAPER BALLOTS SO IT IS NOT JUST EXPANDING THE FRANCHISE.
WE ARE ALSO TOP IN SECURING THE ELECTIONS AND AFTER THE 2000 ELECTION AND WIDESPREAD DOWN ABOUT THE MACHINES, AT THAT TIME, WE SAID, WE ARE GOING TO SPEND THE MONEY AND WE ARE GOING BACK TO PAPER BALLOTS SO WE CAN VERIFY THESE THINGS AND WE HAVE.
I AM PROUD OF OUR SECRETARY OF STATE RIGHT NOW.
BUT, THE ONES THAT CAME BEFORE HER, TOO, HAVE CONSISTENTLY MADE IT EASIER TO VOTE.
>> Gene: GOOD STUFF THERE.
>> Dede: THE LEGISLATURE HAS OPPOSED THAT, AND TRIED TO BLOCK IT BUT THEY HAVE CONTINUED.
>> Gene: GOOD POINT.
DAVID, WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT IT, I MEAN IT USED TO BE SATURDAY BEFORE ELECTION DAY YOU COULD CHANGE YOUR REGISTRATION OR REGISTER TO VOTE.
NOW IT IS RIGHT UP TO ELECTION DAY.
YOU CAN WALK INTO THE PLACE, SIGN UP, BRING YOUR PAPERWORK, DO WHATEVER YOU NEED TO DO AND VOTE THAT DAY AND GET REGISTERED THAT DAY AND VOTE.
THAT IS A HUGE CHANGE WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT IT.
>> Dave: A HUGE CHANGE BUT ALSO I THINK CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE.
WE HAVE POLITICIANS FROM BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE, WE HAVE HAD POLITICAL WILL IN THIS STATE THAT HAS SAID VOTING IS IMPORTANT.
WE SHOULD MAKE IT ACCESSIBLE.
WE HAVE HAD SPANISH LANGUAGE BALLOTS.
DO NOT UNDER ESTIMATE THE ABILITY OF PEOPLE LIKE DANIEL-IVEY SOTO HAS WRITTEN LEGISLATION.
THEY TEND TO ALWAYS GET IT RIGHT.
AND I THINK, YOU KNOW, THERE IS SOMETHING IN THE AIR THAT SAYS, VOTING IS IMPORTANT, WE NEED TO GET EVERYBODY REGISTERED.
WE WANT THEM TO VOTE AND I THINK YOU HAVE TO CREDIT THE COUNTY CLERKS ALL OVER THE STATE HAVE BEEN TREMENDOUSLY HELPFUL IN MAKING SURE THAT EVERYBODY KNOWS, COME TO MY OFFICE AND I'LL REGISTER YOU TO VOTE.
THERE HAVE BEEN GROUPS THAT HAVE RUN AROUND AND REGISTERED VOTERS.
I HAVE TWO TEACHES AT HIGH SCHOOL WHO MAKE IT THEIR MISSION TO MAKE SURE THEIR KIDS ARE REGISTERED TO VOTE WHEN THEY TURN 18 OR 17.
SO, I MEAN IT IS A LOT OF INDIVIDUALS THAT HAVE SELECTIVELY SAID WE LIKE VOTING, WE THINK VOTING IS IMPORTANT, DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE PSYCHOLOGY OF VOTING IS A GOOD THING.
AND I THINK HONESTLY I AM GOING TO TELL YOU I THINK THE PARTIES IN THE DIFFERENT STATES THAT ARE TRYING TO LIMIT VOTING, IT IS GOING TO BACKFIRE, BECAUSE IN SOME WAYS THEY ARE CREATING AN ENVIRONMENT WHERE WHEN YOU TELL PEOPLE THEY CAN'T DO SOMETHING, THEN THEY IMMEDIATELY WANT TO DO IT AND I THINK THAT RESTRICTIVE VOTING IS NOT A GOOD IDEA.
>> Gene: GOOD POINT.
I LOVE THAT.
KRISTELLE, WE GOT SOME INSIGHT THIS WEEK INTO EARLY VOTING TURNOUT, REGISTERED DEMOCRATIC VOTERS OUTPACING REPUBLICAN VOTERS BY A 2-1 MARGIN.
THE GAP IN DEMOCRATS VOTING EARLY IS OUT-PACING THE REGISTRATION GAP BETWEEN THE TWO PARTIES.
WHAT DO YOU THINK EXPLAINS THAT DIFFERENCE?
WHAT IS IT ABOUT DEMOCRATS THAT HAVE EMBRACED EARLY VOTING BUT REPUBLICANS STILL SEEM TO NOT QUITE GET THERE WITH THIS.
>> Kristelle: I DON'T KNOW IF IT IS A MATTER OF WHETHER OR NOT DEMOCRATS EMBRACE EARLY VOTING.
WE HAVE TO LOOK AT THE DEMOGRAPHICS OF THE AREA THAT CD-1 IS.
THE LAST TIME WE HAD SOMEBODY IN THE REPUBLICAN SEAT WAS MAYBE HEATHER WILSON IN LIKE THE EARLY 2000'S.
YEAH, SO, LIKE I DON'T DISAGREE THAT DEMOCRATS ARE OBVIOUSLY UNDERSTANDING VOTING, VOTING RIGHTS, THEIR INTERPRETATION OF DEMOCRACY IS SO DIFFERENT, OBVIOUSLY, FROM REPUBLICANS.
THAT IS WHY WE HAVE THE TWO-PARTY SYSTEM BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY YOU HAVE TO THINK ABOUT WHAT IS THE POPULATION OF CD1?
AND IT ALWAYS SKEWS BLUE.
LIKE EVEN LOOK TO THE MAYORAL RACES THAT ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE PARTISAN, THEY ALWAYS SKEW BLUE.
SO, IT IS FUNNY TOO TO GO BACK TO THE TOPIC THAT YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT, VOTER RIGHTS AND VOTER REGISTRATION, MY FIRST JOB WAS FOR THE NEW VOTERS PROJECT, A NONPROFIT, THAT WOULD REGISTER YOUNG PEOPLE TO VOTE AND THIS CONVERSATIONS THAT WE HAD BACK IN 2005 -- YES I AM THAT OLD -- THAT IN 2005, WHEN WE WERE REGISTERING PEOPLE TO VOTE AT 18 TO 21, WE WOULD GO TO PLACES THAT THEY WOULD BE LIKE PRIDE OR PARTIES OR CENTRAL WHERE PEOPLE WOULD ALL HANGOUT, BUT THE SAME ISSUES THAT WE ARE HAVING NOW ARE THE SAME ISSUES WE HAD BACK THEN.
IT IS ACCESS TO VOTING AND MAKING SURE WE REGISTER PEOPLE ON TIME, MAKING SURE THEY DON'T NEED AN ID TO ACCESS A BALLOT OF SOME SORT.
UNDERSTANDING WHAT A BALLOT LOOKS LIKE AND HOW A PROPERLY MARKED CIRCLE NEEDS TO BE COUNTED AS A VOTE.
ALL OF THE ISSUES THAT WE ARE RUNNING INTO NOW IT SEEMS LIKE MONUMENTAL CHANGE IN NEW MEXICO, BUT THEY ARE CHANGES THAT HAVE BEEN SLOWLY BUT SURELY HAPPENING OVER THE LAST DECADE OR TWO.
>> Gene: GOOD POINT.
SENATOR, TURNOUT STILL PRETTY LOW OVERALL, 4% ON MONDAY OF THIS WEEK, WHICH IS NOT UNUSUAL FOR SPECIAL, BUT HAS ALL THE RHETORIC ABOUT VOTING INTEGRITY COME HOME TO ROOST FOR YOU?
WHAT IS GOING ON RIGHT NOW IN THIS MOMENT?
>> Dede: NO.
I THINK THAT WE ARE GOING TO HAVE A LOW TURNOUT IN THIS ELECTION.
BUT, THE WHOLE STORY ISN'T IN.
THERE ARE 15,000 PEOPLE WHO HAVE REQUESTED ABSENTEE BALLOTS AND WHO HAVE NOT YET VOTED.
SO, YOU KNOW, THIS IS A BIG TREND NOW.
WE HAVE SEEN THIS YEAR, THAT IS HUGE, HUGE UPTICK IN THE USE OF ABSENTEE BALLOTS.
YES, EARLIER VOTING IS IMPORTANT BUT WHAT MARKED THIS YEAR AND WHAT MOSTLY IRKED THE PEOPLE THAT LOST IN THESE STATES WHERE THEY ARE TRYING TO RESTRICT ABSENTEE BALLOTS IS THE USE OF ABSENTEE BALLOTS.
IT USED TO BE A REPUBLICAN THING.
REPUBLICANS WERE ALWAYS BETTER AT ABSENTEES AND THEY SKEWED TOWARD THE OLDER VOTERS, THE MILITARY VOTERS, BUT NOW MANY MORE PEOPLE ARE USING THEM BECAUSE OF THE PANDEMIC AND THAT IS A TREND THAT IS GOING TO CONTINUE.
AND, YOU KNOW, I WORK PART-TIME FOR COMMON CAUSE NEW MEXICO.
AND WE DID A LOT OF WORK DURING THE GENERAL TEACHING PEOPLE HOW TO VOTE ABSENTEE.
BECAUSE, IT IS DIFFERENT THAN VOTING IN PERSON.
AND YOU CAN'T SCREW UP.
AND WHAT DO YOU DO IF YOU SCREW UP?
THOSE ARE ALL QUESTIONS THAT PEOPLE HAD.
I THINK THAT WE ARE GOING TO CONTINUE TO SEE PEOPLE WANT TO VOTE BOTH DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS.
IT IS THE FOUNDATION OF DEMOCRACY AND, YES, I THINK PEOPLE ARE REBELLING WHEN BARRIERS ARE PUT UP THERE UNNECESSARILY.
IT IS SO OBVIOUS TO PEOPLE.
>> Kristelle: I DO WANT TO ASK THE QUESTION TO ALL OF US.
HOW MUCH OF VOTING TURNOUT IS ACTUALLY BECAUSE IT IS NOT A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION YEAR OR NOT GUBERNATORIAL.
I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE STATISTICS ARE, BUT THERE HAS GOT TO BE SOMETHING THAT SAYS, SPECIAL ELECTIONS SHOULD HISTORICALLY HAVE LOW TURNOUT BECAUSE PEOPLE FORGET.
>> Dede: YOU ARE REALLY LUCKY IF YOU GET A 20% TURNOUT IN A SPECIAL ELECTION AND ALSO IN A MAYORAL ELECTION.
IT IS USUALLY LOW.
>> Gene: DAVID, BERNALILLO COUNTY CLERK, LINDA STOVER, TOLD ME IN A FACEBOOK LIVE DISCUSSION ON WEDNESDAY THAT NEW MEXICO HAS SOME OF THE MOST SECURE ELECTION SYSTEMS IN THE COUNTRY.
SHE MENTIONED PAPER BALLOTS.
DO YOU THINK THAT IS THE GENERAL CONSENSUS AMONG VOTERS RIGHT NOW?
>> Dave: THE VOTERS ARE CONFIDENT IN NEW MEXICO'S ABILITY TO HANDLE GOOD ELECTIONS AND, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE DO -- PEOPLE AREN'T STUPID.
THIS IDEA THAT THE ELECTION WAS STOLEN GOING BACK SIX OR SEVEN MONTHS, IF YOU SAW WHAT WAS HAPPENING IN ARIZONA, EVEN THE PEOPLE THAT WERE SORT OF SUPPORTING IT, THEY ARE SAYING, OKAY, THIS IS OVER.
YOU DO NOT WANT TO OVERPLAY YOUR HAND.
17,000 DIFFERENT ENTITIES TOUCH VOTING IN THIS COUNTRY.
I MEAN, THE IDEA THAT THERE COULD BE A CONSPIRACY AND THAT YOU CAN SOMEHOW THROW AN ELECTION, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE, BUT LINDA STOVE AND MAGGIE TOULOUSE OLIVER, THE SECRETARY OF STATE, NEW MEXICO HAS A GOOD REPUTATION FOR VOTING BECAUSE THEY HAVE WORKED AT IT.
WHEN THEY WEREN'T GOING TO STICK WITH THE MACHINES AND THEY SAID, WE FELT THERE WAS SOME QUESTION ABOUT WHETHER MACHINES WERE SAFE, THEY SIMPLY PITCHED IT AND SAID THE INTEGRITY OF THESE ELECTIONS ARE GOOD.
THEY WORKED AT IT.
AND ALSO I THINK THE STATE LEGISLATURE COULD BE A LITTLE BIT MORE GENEROUS WITH GIVING THESE COUNTY CLERKS MORE MONEY TO, RUN ELECTIONS BUT I THINK THE STATE PARTIES COULD BE BETTER ABOUT SAYING, I DON'T CARE IF YOU'RE A DEMOCRAT OR YOU ARE A REPUBLICAN OR SOMETHING IN BETWEEN, THEY NEED TO ENCOURAGE VOTING ALSO.
WE NEED THE ENTIRE CORE SAYING, GET OUT AND VOTE.
YOU KNOW IT IS SORT OF DUES YOU PAY FOR LIVING IN A DEMOCRACY, EVERYBODY NEEDS TO PUSH VOTING WITHOUT A DOUBT.
>> Gene: THANK YOU FOR THAT, DAVE.
THAT IS GOING TO DO IT FOR NOW.
LOVE TO HEAR WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT EARLY VOTING AND ALL OPINIONS YOU JUST HEARD ABOUT NEW MEXICO'S ELECTION SYSTEM.
DROP US A LINE ON FACEBOOK, TWITTER OR INSTAGRAM BY SEARCHING FOR AT NEW MEXICO IN FOCUS.
THIS SPRING THE PUEBLOS OF JEMEZ AND LAGUNA SUE THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS OVER A 2020 RULE THAT WEAKENS OR IN SOME CASES JUST GETS RID OF PROTECTIONS FOR EPHEMERAL OR INTERMITTENT STREAMS UNDER THE FEDERAL CLEAN WATER ACT.
HERE IN NEW MEXICO THAT IS A BIG DEAL.
CLOSE TO 90% OF OUR WATERWAYS FALL UNDER THOSE TWO DESIGNATIONS.
CORRESPONDENT LAURA PASKUS TALKS WITH CLIFF VILLA AT THE UNM LAW CLINIC WHICH FILED THE SUIT AND CHRIS TOYA, WITH THE PUEBLO OF JEMEZ.
>> Laura: THERE HAS BEEN BACK AND FORTH FOR YEARS NOW WHETHER OR NOT TO PROTECT SMALL WATERWAYS UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT AND LAST SUMMER THE TRUMP ERA RULE TOOK EFFECT.
THAT ESSENTIALLY THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND U.S. ARMY CORE OF ENGINEERS WILL NO LONGER PROTECT CERTAIN TYPES OF WATERWAYS UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT.
NOW THE PUEBLOS OF LAGUNA AND JEMEZ HAVE FILED A LAWSUIT AGAINST THE TWO AGENCIES REGARDING THIS RULE.
LET'S START WITH YOU CHRIS TOYA.
YOU ARE FROM JEMEZ PUEBLO.
CAN YOU TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHY THESE EPHEMERAL AND INTERMITTENT WATER WAYS ARE SO IMPORTANT TO NEW MEXICANS?
>> Toya: BECAUSE WE LIVE IN HIGH DESERT SOUTHWEST.
87% OF OUR STREAMS ARE EPHEMERAL MEANING THAT DURING THE MONSOON EVENTS OR SNOW MELT, THESE ARROYOS, DRAINAGES, GET FILLED WITH WATER AND THEY ARE TRIBUTARIES TO THE MAIN JEMEZ RIVER.
AND WE USE THE WATER FOR IRRIGATION OF OUR CROPS AND THEN IT IS A MEANS OF FOOD SUPPLY AS WELL.
WE GO FISHING AND FISH THAT WE CATCH IN THE JEMEZ RIVER IS WHAT WE EAT.
ONE OTHER IMPORTANT FACTOR IS THAT THE WATER IN THE JEMEZ RIVER IS USED IN CEREMONIES.
AND THIS IS A THREAT TO OUR WAY OF LIFE.
>> Laura: CLIFF VILLA, YOU WORKED ON THIS LAWSUIT THROUGH THE UNM LAW CLINIC.
CAN YOU TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHAT TYPES OF POLLUTION, WHAT TYPES OF THREATS THESE SORTS OF WATERWAYS ARE UNDER, AND, IF SUCCESSFUL, WHAT THIS LAWSUIT WOULD DO?
>> Villa: THANKS LAURA.
SO, THROUGH THE UNM SCHOOL OF LAW CLINIC, WE HAVE WORKED WITH A NUMBER OF TRIBES AND TRIBAL MEMBERS FOR A LONG TIME.
AND WE LISTENED TO THEIR CONCERNS AND WE THINK ABOUT HOW WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO USE THE LAW TO ADDRESS THOSE CONCERNS.
ONE OF THE BIGGEST CONCERNS WE HAVE HEARD RECENTLY WAS CONCERNS ABOUT CONTINUING TO PROTECT TRIBAL WATERS UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT.
THE CLEAN WATER ACT IS INCREDIBLY BROAD.
IT BASICALLY APPLIES TO ALL POLLUTANTS, YOU KNOW, TOXIC POLLUTANTS, HAZARDOUS WASTE, EVEN IN SOME CASES THINGS LIKE DIRT OR COW MANURE.
SO THE THREAT TO NEW MEXICO'S WATERS CAN COME FROM MANY DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS BUT ONE OF THEM MIGHT BE SOMETHING INDUSTRIAL, ACTUALLY, LIKE MINING, INCLUDING URANIUM MINING IN THE NAVAJO NATION AND GRANTS MINING DISTRICT.
THERE IS PUMICE MINING IN THE JEMEZ WATERSHED.
THERE IS SEWAGE, RAW SEWAGE IS A BIG PROBLEM ACROSS THE COUNTRY FOR A LONG TIME.
SO, EVEN THINGS LIKE SEDIMENTS THAT MIGHT CLOG UP A CHANNEL AND PREVENT WATERS FROM REACHING COMMUNITIES COULD BE AN ISSUE AND SOMETHING THAT IS REGULATED UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT WHEN THE CLEAN WATER ACT IS APPLIED.
BUT THE PROBLEM HERE IS THE TRUMP RULE SEVERELY DIMINISHED THE SCOPE OF PROTECTION UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT.
>> Laura: SO, FEDERAL ADMINISTRATIONS HAVE GONE BACK AND FORTH ON THESE PROTECTIONS.
EVEN STATES HAVE GONE BACK AND FORTH.
UNDER THE MARTINEZ ADMINISTRATION, STATE OF NEW MEXICO OPPOSED THESE PROTECTIONS.
CLIFF, LET'S START WITH YOU.
CAN YOU TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHY PROTECTIONS UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT WOULD BE CONTROVERSIAL.
>> Villa: PART OF THE CONTROVERSY IS RESISTANCE TO FEDERAL REGULATION AT ALL.
THE CLEAN WATER ACT WAS DESIGNED TO ESTABLISH NATIONAL STANDARDS THAT STATES WOULD IMPLEMENT.
THERE HAS ALWAYS BEEN A STATE COMPONENT THERE.
I DON'T THINK THAT IS FULLY UNDERSTOOD BUT THERE IS ALSO A LOT OF MISUNDERSTANDING ABOUT WHAT THE CLEAN WATER ACT DOES.
ONE OF MY FAVORITE EXAMPLES OF MISUNDERSTANDING WAS THERE WAS A RUMOR THAT OBAMA WAS ATTEMPTING TO PROMULGATE A RULE THAT WOULD REGULATE PUDDLES UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT.
SO THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION ACTUALLY WENT OUT OF ITS WAY TO WRITE A RULE THAT SAID THIS RULE DOES NOT APPLY TO PUDDLES.
AND THE FIRST THING THAT THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION CLAIMED AFTER TRUMP CAME IN IN 2017 WAS THAT OBAMA'S RULE HAS BEEN USED AND IN PARTICULAR IT IS REGULATING PUDDLES.
WHEN OBAMA WENT OUT OF HIS WAY TO SAY, NO, THE RULE DOESN'T REGULATE PUDDLES.
THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF MISUNDERSTANDING AND MISSTATEMENT ABOUT THE CLEAN WATER ACT SCOPE.
AND WHAT IT IS ABOUT IS PROTECTING YOUR WATER AND MINE, WATERS IN THE JEMEZ RIVER, WATERS IN THE RIO GRANDE AND WE GET SO LITTLE WATER IN NEW MEXICO WE DON'T HAVE ANY TO SPARE.
SO MAYBE THERE IS SOME GENUINE CONTROVERSY AROUND THE EDGES OF WETLANDS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES BUT ALL THE WATER IN NEW MEXICO IS NEEDED FOR PURPOSES HERE IN NEW MEXICO, PARTICULARLY FOR THE TRIBAL COMMUNITIES.
>> Laura: CHRIS TOYA CLEAN WATER JUST DOESN'T SEEM CONTROVERSIAL TO ME.
CAN YOU TALK ABOUT WHAT YOU HAVE SEEN OVER THE YEARS IN TERMS OF, YOU KNOW, WANTING TO PROTECTS THESE WATERS AND, IN PARTICULAR, TRIBAL WATERS?
>> Toya: YOU KNOW THROUGHOUT THE YEARS, I HAVE NOTICED THAT WE ARE GETTING MORE AND MORE PEOPLE, RECREATIONISTS IN THE JEMEZ MOUNTAINS.
YOU KNOW THE FORESTS HAVE BEEN DECLARED IN AN AREA UP IN THE JEMEZ MOUNTAINS, A NATIONAL RECREATION AREA.
AND WE ARE GETTING PEOPLE BY THE THOUSANDS.
I THINK ANNUALLY, THIS IS OLD DATA, BUT THEY WERE SAYING THAT WE GET OVER 1.6 MILLION VISITORS IN THE JEMEZ MOUNTAINS AND THE LARGEST BOTTLENECK IS THE PUEBLO ITSELF.
WE ARE GETTING SO MUCH VEHICLE TRAFFIC ON THE HIGHWAY AND IT IS DANGEROUS FOR THE PEOPLE.
BUT WHAT PEOPLE DON'T REALIZE IS THAT THEY ARE TREKKING ON THE ROADWAYS, ON AREAS THAT DON'T HAVE ANY PATHS.
YOU GOT VEHICLE TRAFFIC.
YOU GOT FOOT TRAFFIC AND YOU ALSO GOT CATTLE.
AND SO WHAT HAPPIES IS THAT THESE AREAS START GETTING ERODED AND WE HAVE NOTICED THIS PAST FEW YEARS, WE ARE JUST GETTING SO MUCH SEDIMENT IN OUR IRRIGATION SYSTEMS.
IT IS ONE ISSUE THAT WE ARE FACING.
AND, YOU KNOW, WE ARE FARMERS AND WE USE THIS WATER FROM THE JEMEZ RIVER TO IRRIGATE OUR FIELDS BUT WE ARE GETTING SEDIMENT LOADS THAT ARE UNBELIEVABLE.
THE OTHER ISSUE IS THAT WE NEED THIS CLEAN WATER, AS I STATED EARLIER.
WATER IS LIFE AND WATER IS CRUCIAL IN TRIBAL LIFE ESPECIALLY IN CEREMONIES.
WE USE THE WATER FROM THE JEMEZ RIVER, WATER FROM THE SPRINGS TO CONDUCT CEREMONIES, NOT ONLY FOR OURSELVES BUT FOR THE WHOLE WORLD, IN A SENSE, BECAUSE WE ARE PROTECTING AND PRAYING FOR THE BALANCE OF MOTHER EARTH.
AND SO WHEN THAT HAPPENS, YOU KNOW, NOT ONLY DO TRIBAL MEMBERS BENEFIT BUT THE WHOLE WORLD BENEFITS.
>> Laura: LOTS OF DIFFERENT GROUPS HAVE WEIGHED IN ON THIS RULE ON ALL SIDES OF THE ISSUE.
CHRIS, CAN YOU TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHY THIS LAWSUIT IS SO IMPORTANT FOR THE PUEBLOS IN TERMS OF THINGS LIKE JURISDICTION AND SOVEREIGNTY?
>> Toya: CURRENTLY THE JEMEZ PUEBLO RESERVATION IS APPROXIMATELY 90,000 ACRES.
WE ONLY CLAIM AS FAR AS THE BOUNDARIES GO, A FRACTION OF WHAT OUR ANCESTORS USED AT ONE TIME.
SOME OF THE ANCESTRAL HOMELANDS ARE UNDER THE MANAGEMENT OF THE U.S. FOREST SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT AND PRIVATE PROPERTY.
SO, THE WATERSHED, JEMEZ WATERSHED, IS ABOVE THE VALLEY OF JEMEZ PUEBLO AND SO THE MAIN WATERSHED IS IN THE VALLES CALDERA NATIONAL PRESERVE AND THE SAN PEDRO WILDERNESS IN THE NACIEMENTO MOUNTAINS AND SO, YOU HAVE DIFFERENT LAND MANAGEMENT HAPPENING FROM DIFFERENT FEDERAL AGENCIES.
AND AS I STATED EARLIER, WE HAVE GOT MANY, MANY THOUSANDS OF RECREATIONISTS ENJOYING THE MOUNTAINS AND YOU HAVE GOT YOUR RANCHERS WITH CATTLE AND, YOU KNOW, WE NEED THESE WATERS PROTECTED NOT ONLY FOR OURSELVES BUT FOR WILDLIFE, FOR ALL HUMANITY.
IF WE DON'T PROTECT OUR WATER, WE ARE PUTTING OURSELVES IN SITUATION WHERE, YOU KNOW, IF OUR WATERS ARE REALLY POLLUTED, THEN, WE'LL BE LOOKING BACK AND SAYING WHY DID WE DO THAT?
WHY DIDN'T WE PUT THE EFFORT INTO PROTECTING OUR WATERS.
IT IS A VERY IMPORTANT ISSUE THAT WE ARE FACING TODAY.
TRIBAL PEOPLE ACROSS THE UNITED STATES AND ALL PEOPLE, WE SEEM TO KIND OF HAVE MISSED THE POINT IN BEING HUMAN AND BEING CONNECTED TO MOTHER EARTH.
I THINK OUR PRIORITIES ARE BUSINESS AND MAKING MONEY BUT, YOU KNOW, I HOPE THAT EVENTUALLY WE COME TO OUR SENSES AND START PROTECTING WHAT IS IMPORTANT FOR ALL LIFE.
>> Laura: CLIFF, IN OUR FINAL MINUTE HERE, WHAT HAPPENS NEXT WITH THIS LAWSUIT?
>> Villa: WELL, THERE HAVE BEEN A NUMBER OF SIMILAR LAWSUITS FILED ACROSS THE COUNTRY, A LAWSUIT BY THE NAVAJO NATION, A LAWSUIT INVOLVING TRIBES IN ARIZONA TO WASHINGTON.
WHAT WE HAVE SEEN, IS THAT THE NEW BIDEN DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE HAS SOUGHT TO SEEK A STAY OF THAT LITIGATION AND MAYBE THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD CONSIDER AS WELL, BUT WE ARE ALSO VERY CONCERNED ABOUT PROTECTION OF WATER IN NEW MEXICO RIGHT NOW.
AND WE REALLY NEED TO THINK ABOUT HOW WE BEGIN DOING THAT.
THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION ON DAY ONE INAUGURATION SIGNALED AN INTEREST IN RECONSIDERING AND POSSIBLY REPEALING THE TRUMP RULE AND WE WOULD LOVE TO SEE THAT, BUT THAT PROCESS TAKES TIME.
IT COULD TAKE A MATTER OF YEARS TO GO THROUGH THE FORMAL RULE MAKING PROCESS.
ONE THING THAT OUR LITIGATION IS ASKING FOR IS JUST VACATE THE RULE, JUST TAKE US BACK TO WHERE WE WERE BEFORE.
AT THAT POINT THE PUEBLO OF JEMEZ, PUEBLO OF LAGUNA CAN MAKE THE ARGUMENT EXACTLY AS CHRIS IS SAYING, WHY IT IS IMPORTANT TO PROTECT OUR WATERS RIGHT NOW.
WE NEED A NEW RULE AND EVERYBODY AGREES WE NEED A NEW RULE GOING FORWARD BUT WHILE THAT RULE-MAKING PROCESS IS CONTINUING, WE WOULD LIKE TO STOP THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS RULE THAT JUST ELIMINATES THE PROTECTION FOR SO MUCH OF NEW MEXICO'S WATER.
CLIFF VILLA AND CHRIS TOYA, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR JOINING US ON NEW MEXICO IN FOCUS TODAY.
>> Toya: THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY.
>> Villa: TRAINING, YOU LAURA.
>> Gene: WATCHING SOCIAL MEDIA AND PRESS, IT HAS BEEN FASCINATING TO SEE HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE READY, WILLING AND ABLE TO KEEP DONNING A MASK IN PUBLIC.
PERHAPS A SMALL PERCENTAGE OF FOLKS NOW HABITUATED TO WEARING ONE, BUT A GOOD NUMBER MENTIONED NOT HAVING A COLD OR FLU IN SOME TIME.
THAT IS HARD TO ARGUE.
HOW LONG IT LASTS, AS PANEL MUSED EARLIER, IS ANYONE'S GUESS.
FOR ME THE MASK IS STILL IN THE POCKET IF MY PLAN INCLUDES BEING INDOORS ESPECIALLY IF THERE ARE SENIORS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY.
I WOULD LIKE TO ASK IF FOLKS MIGHT BE MORE COMFORTS IF I ALSO WEAR A MASK.
MOST SAY NO, BUT I WANT THE OPTION OUT OF COURTESY.
HAVE YOU SETTLED ON A PERSONAL MASK PROTOCOL?
IF YOU HAVE CHOSEN TO STAY THE COURSE OR SAID GOOD-BYE TO ANY AND ALL MASK WEARING, LET US KNOW OVER AT THE FOCUS ON NEW MEXICO FACEBOOK PAGE.
LOVE TO HEAR FROM YOU.
THANKS AGAIN FOR JOINING US AND STAYING INFORMED AND ENGAGED.
SEE YOU AGAIN NEXT WEEK IN FOCUS.
Our Land: New Mexico’s Environmental Past, Present and Future is a local public television program presented by NMPBS